• 23Jul

     

    White House Predicts Record Deficit
    New White House estimates predict an unemployment rate of 9 percent and a budget deficit of $1.42 trillion next year — even bigger than previously expected.

    Officials Say Gov’t Now Borrowing 41 Cents Of Every Dollar Spent

    New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends.

    That’s actually a little better than the administration predicted in February.

    The new estimates paint a grim unemployment picture as the economy experiences a relatively jobless recovery. The unemployment rate, presently averaging 9.5 percent, would average 9 percent next year under the new estimates.

    The Office of Management and Budget report has ominous news for President Barack Obama should he seek re-election in 2012 - a still-high unemployment rate of 8.1 percent. That would be well above normal, which is closer to a rate of 5.5 percent to 6 percent. Private economists don’t think the unemployment rate will drop to those levels until well into this decade.

    “The U.S. economy still faces strong headwinds,” the OMB report said. They include tight credit markets, a high inventory of unsold housing and retrenchment by state governments bound by balanced budget mandates. The European debt crisis has also had an impact.

    “Despite these headwinds, the administration expects economic growth and job creation to continue for the rest of 2010 and to rise in 2011 and beyond,” the report said.

    The gaping deficits are of increasing concern to voters. But Obama and Democrats controlling Congress are mostly taking a pass on deficit reduction this year as they await possible recommendations from Obama’s deficit commission.

    While there’s a slight improvement in the deficit for the current year compared to the administration’s February forecast, next year’s predicted $1.42 trillion worth , next year’s predicted $1.42 trillion worth of red ink - that’s 37 cents of borrowing for every dollar spent - is looking worse. It’s about $150 billion more than previously predicted, because of still-slumping tax revenues.

    The current record holder is the $1.41 trillion deficit for 2009.

    Economists agree that the most important measure of the deficit is against the size of the economy. Opinions vary, but many economists say a deficit of 3 percent of gross domestic product is sustainable since it would stabilize the overall debt when measured relative to the economy.

    The report put the deficit at 10 percent of GDP this year and 9.2 percent of GDP next year. It would never reach the 3 percent figure under Obama’s predictions - which underestimate war costs and depend on assumptions of tax hikes that may not materialize.

    OMB Director Peter Orszag said the numbers represent a “fiscal situation that requires attention.”

    Obama “has done little to confront this domestic enemy,” said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind. “Washington desperately needs real leadership. We cannot continue to postpone the hard choices and sacrifices that are necessary to stop this fiscal train wreck.”

    Deficits have skyrocketed since the recession took hold in 2008 and Congress responded with a massive bailout of the financial system and last year’s $862 billion stimulus measure.

    “What we should be doing now is putting in place deficit reduction policies that will kick in after the economy has more fully recovered,” said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad of North Dakota. “It is an unsustainable long-term course.”

    Tags:

  • 18May

    America’s Underclass: Growing Gap Between the Rich and Poor
    Macro economic data suggest the great recession is over. But the gap between the haves and the have-nots is growing, thanks, in large part, to a jobless recovery. Wall Street Cheat Sheet’s Damien Hoffman says the growing underclass now accounts for about 10% of the U.S. population.

    In this clip, he and his brother Derek, who jointly run the Wall Street Cheat Sheet website, point to several signs America is turning into a two-class society:  

    -The foreclosure problem. 2.8 million homes were foreclosed in 2009.  RealyTrac expects that number to increase to 3-3.5 million in 2010.  Damien Hoffman thinks it could be even higher if “strategic foreclosures” become a more accepted practice.
    - Unemployment.  The official rate is 9.9% but the wider measure of under employed and those who have given up on their job search is more like 17%.   That’s more than 24 million Americans out of work.
    - Record numbers using food stamps. The Agriculture Department said a record 40 million Americans, or 1 in 8 Americans, may not be able to eat without government assistance.  “This is the ultimate sign of an under class,”  the Hoffman Brothers say.
    - Take a look at Dollar Tree Stores. The discounter’s stock is near an all-time high while revenues are up 12.5% this year.  In other words, more Americans are chasing cheaper goods.

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • 15May

    Bank-Failures swell to 72 for 2010
    State regulators shuttered small banks in Illinois, Missouri, Georgia and Michigan, including a 23-branch community bank that failed despite having received an infusion from the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program.

    So far this year, 72 banks have collapsed and the spate of failures is expected to continue throughout 2010. Although there are signs that the worst of the financial crisis may be over for the banking industry, financial institutions are still being battered by severe losses on mortgages and commercial real-estate loans.

    In the largest of Friday’s closures, Illinois regulators closed Midwest Bank & Trust Co. of Elmwood Park. FirstMerit Corp., based in Akron, Ohio, agreed to take over Midwest’s 23 branches, $2.42 billion in deposits and essentially all of its $3.17 billion in assets.

    Midwest had been warning for months that it was in dire financial straits. On Thursday, the bank said in a securities filing that it would likely be placed into receivership because it had been unable to raise fresh capital after a previous plan had been rejected by the Federal Reserve.

    Its failure is a financial blow to the government, which had previously swapped the preferred shares that it held in Midwest for common shares. The government had received the preferred shares when it injected Midwest with $84.8 million of TARP funds. Common shareholders typically are wiped out when a bank fails.

    FirstMerit, which has been a bidder on other failed banks, agreed to pay the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. a premium of 0.4% for Midwest’s deposits. FirstMerit also entered into a loss-sharing transaction on $2.27 billion of Midwest’s assets.

    As part of the deal, the FDIC will receive a so-called value appreciation instrument, which will provide the agency with additional money if FirstMerit’s share price rises over a certain amount of time.

    Midwest was the 11th bank to fail in Illinois so far this year.

    Elsewhere, regulators in Georgia, Illinois and Michigan closed three one-branch banks.

    In Georgia, state regulators seized Satilla Community Bank, of Saint Marys, Ga. Ameris Bank, based in Moultrie, Ga., agreed to assume all of the deposits and most of its assets. Satilla had $135.7 million in assets and $134 million in deposits at March 31.

    Ameris, which is paying a premium of 0.19% to assume Satilla’s deposits, also entered into a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC. It was the eighth bank failure of the year in Georgia.

    Michigan regulators closed Plymouth-based New Liberty Bank, which had roughly $109.1 million in assets and $101.8 million in deposits. Bank of Ann Arbor, based in Ann Arbor, assumed all of the deposits and agreed to buy nearly all of the assets. It didn’t pay a premium for the deposits.

    In Missouri, regulators closed Southwest Community Bank, based in Springfield. Its $96.6 million in assets and $102.5 million in deposits are being assumed by Simmons First National Bank, of Pine Bluff, Ark.

    The FDIC estimated the four failures would cost $301.7 million to its deposit insurance fund.

    Tags: ,

  • 02Apr

    Yield on 10-year note near 4%, highest since June ‘09

     

    The biggest increase in jobs in three years pushed interest rates higher in the bond market as bond prices fell. The dollar rose. The stock market was closed.

    The yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose to 3.95% from 3.87% late Thursday, its highest level since last June and the latest sign of confidence that the U.S. economy is recovering.

    The stock market is closed for Good Friday. Stock futures rose in an abbreviated session of electronic trading. Dow Jones industrial average futures and Standard & Poor’s 500 index futures each rose about 0.3%.

    The yield on the 10-year note is approaching 4%, a level that hasn’t been seen since October 2008, just before the financial crisis peaked.

    The 10-year’s yield went as high as 4.09% that month, before plummeting as low as 2.06% in December 2008 as the credit crisis erupted and investors poured money into bonds as they cut back their exposure to risk.

    Friday’s trading was the closest the yield has been to 4% since last June, when it reached 3.96%.

    The Labor Department said Friday that employers added 162,000 jobs in March. Economists had forecast an increase of 190,000 jobs. However, private employers accounted for most of the growth. Some analysts had forecast that temporary government hiring for the 2010 Census would play a bigger role.

    The dollar rose as confidence increased about the U.S. economy. The ICE Futures US dollar index, which measures the dollar against six currencies, rose 0.6%.

    The Dow on Thursday within 43 points of the psychological barrier of 11,000, a level it hasn’t topped in 18 months.

    The Dow gained 4.1% for the quarter, its best first-quarter performance since 1999. Small, daily gains replaced the big triple-digit moves that defined the market’s rally throughout much of 2009 as major indexes hit 12-year lows in March of that year.

    The S&P 500 rose 4.9% during the first quarter, its best first-quarter since 1998.

    Tags: ,

  • 19Mar

    Failed banks list 7 announced today http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html

    Tags:

  • 21Feb

    What you need to know about credit card reform
     The new credit card regulations are finally here. Starting Monday, Feb. 22, 2010, banks will need to abide a spate of new rules on terms and disclosures. The idea behind the landmark law was to prevent banks from using unfair practices that dig borrowers deeper into debt.
    The new credit card law is finally here. Starting Monday, banks will need to abide by new regulations on terms and disclosures. The idea behind the landmark law was to prevent banks from using practices that often dug borrowers deeper into debt.
    A look at how the credit card law affects key aspects of your account.

    INTEREST RATES

    THEN: Banks could raise the interest rate on an account at any time, including the rate on an existing balances, even if you weren’t late on payments.

    NOW: The rate cannot be raised in the first year after an account is opened unless an introductory rate has come to an end. After that, cardholders must be notified 45 days in advance of any rate change.

    For existing balances, rates can’t be raised unless the account is at least 60 days past due. If payments are made on time for six consecutive months, the original rate must be restored.

    There’s still no cap on rates.

    DISCLOSURES

    THEN: The fine print on cardholder agreements was often difficult to understand. Rates, fees and penalties for other services such as cash advances, for example, could be hard to find. The impact of the interest rate on paying down a balance was hard to compute.

    NOW: Cardholders will see how many months it will take to pay off a balance if only minimum payments are made. Statements will also indicate how much needs to be paid each month to pay off a balance within three years.

    SERVICE FEES

    THEN: Banks could charge as much as they wanted. They could assess annual fees, activation fees and other fees. This was mostly a problem for subprime cards marketed to those with poor credit scores. One popular card, for example, the Premier Bankcard, charged $256 in first-year fees for a $250 credit line.

    NOW: Service fees, such as activation and annual fees, will be capped at 25 percent of the credit limit during the first year of use. After that, there is no cap.

    GRACE PERIODS

    THEN: Some card companies sent out statements not long before payments were due, and sometimes shifted payment due dates from month to month, meaning that payments would not always have enough time to arrive and get processed before being deemed late. As a result, some cardholders ended up getting charged interest or late fees even when they thought they were sending in payments on time.

    NOW: The law requires that due dates remain consistent. Statements must be sent out 21 days before the payment due date, and finance charges and fees cannot be applied before that period is up. In practice, about half of card issuers have extended grace periods to as long as 25 days.

    OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES

    THEN: Banks set credit limits, then routinely allowed charges to exceed those limits. When that happened, though, the customer was charged an over-the-limit fee as high as $39. These fees were often triggered by interest charges or late-payment fees that pushed a balance over the credit limit. What’s more, multiple over-the-limit fees could get charged in a single billing cycle if the balance was paid down and another charge pushed the balance back over the limit.

    NOW: The cardholder must specifically agree to permit transactions that exceed the credit limit. Only then can over-the-limit fees be charged. But the fees can’t be triggered by other fees or interest charges. Only one over-the-limit fee may be imposed during a billing cycle. No over-the-limit fees may be charged unless the cardholder has specifically agreed to permit transactions exceeding their authorized credit limit. These fees can no longer be triggered by other fees or interest charges imposed by the card issuer, and only one such fee may be imposed during a billing cycle.

    In practice, several of the largest card companies have dropped these fees. Some banks are using pop-up boxes on their Web sites or other methods to obtain consumer authorization.

    UNIVERSAL DEFAULT

    THEN: If you made a late payment on one credit card or loan, or even late payments for obligations like utility bills, that could trigger interest rate hikes on other credit card accounts.

    NOW: Card companies cannot raise interest rates on existing credit card balances. Interest rates can’t rise during the first year an account is open, unless the original agreement spelled out a promotional rate for a limited time.

    Consumers with older accounts must be informed of any interest rate increase on new charges at least 45 days in advance. They must also be given a chance to opt out of the hike by canceling the account and paying down the balance at the old interest rate. If an interest rate is increased, the card company must review the account once every six months to assess whether the rate should be dropped.

    STUDENTS

    THEN: Students arriving on college campuses often confronted a gantlet of credit card marketers handing out T-shirts, pizza and other gifts in exchange for filling out card applications. Credit cards were frequently handed out without checking the applicant’s income sources. In 2008, 84 percent of undergraduates had at least one credit card. Average balances topped $3,100.

    NOW: Credit cards may no longer be issued to anyone under age 21, unless the applicant has a co-signer, or can show independent means to repay the debt. Colleges must disclose any marketing deals they make with credit card companies. Banks are not allowed to hand out gifts on or near campuses or at college-related events.

    Tags: , ,

  • 25Dec

    Stockshakers are looking to go LONG  FRE and FNM

    Options are very cheap and thinly traded.

    U.S. Ends Cap on Fannie, Freddie Lifeline for 3 Years

     

    The U.S. Treasury Department will remove the caps on aid to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the next three years, to allay investor concerns that the companies will exhaust the available government assistance.

    The two companies, the largest sources of mortgage financing in the U.S., are currently under government conservatorship and have caps of $200 billion each on backstop capital from the Treasury. Under the new agreement announced today, these limits can rise as needed to cover net worth losses through 2012.

    The Obama administration is “beginning to realize it’s not getting better and it’s not likely to get better” soon in the housing market, said Julian Mann, who helps oversee $5.5 billion in bonds as a vice president at First Pacific Advisors LLC in Los Angeles. “They don’t want the foreclosures now, so they’re saying, we’ll pay whatever it takes to continue to kick the can down the road.”

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now are using a combined $111 billion of the total $400 billion lifeline. Treasury Department officials said they didn’t expect the companies to need assistance beyond what is available under the current caps, barring significant deterioration in the economic outlook.

    Today’s announcement “should leave no uncertainty about the Treasury’s commitment to support these firms as they continue to play a vital role in the housing market during this current crisis,” the Treasury said in a statement in Washington.

    Portfolio Size

    The Treasury also relaxed its timeline for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to shrink their portfolios of mortgage assets. Previously, the companies were instructed to reduce their portfolios at a rate of 10 percent a year. Now, they will be required to keep the value of their portfolios below a maximum limit, currently $900 billion, that will go down by 10 percent a year.

    This means they will not need to take immediate action to trim their holdings and could allow them to rise. Fannie Mae’s portfolio ended October at $771.5 billion and Freddie Mac’s holdings at the end of November were $761.8 billion, according to the latest figures released by the companies.

    “Treasury does not expect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be active buyers to increase the size of their retained mortgage portfolios, but neither is it expected that active selling will be necessary,” the Treasury said.

    Fed Program

    The change in the portfolio limits may ease investor concern that the companies could be forced to shrink their portfolios at the same time that the Federal Reserve ends its $1.25 trillion mortgage-bond purchase program. That could have exacerbated pressure on mortgage rates caused by the end of the Fed program, Laurie Goodman, an analyst in New York at Amherst Securities Group LP, said this month.

    The Treasury said today that it is ending its mortgage- backed security purchase program as of Dec. 31, after about $220 billion in purchases. The government also is eliminating a short-term credit facility for the two companies and the Federal Home Loan Banks that was never used.

    Also today, the companies disclosed in regulatory filings that Fannie Mae Chief Executive Officer Michael Williams and Freddie Mac CEO Charles Haldeman Jr. are each eligible for compensation of as much as $6 million this year.

    Executive Pay

    Pay at the mortgage-finance companies, which were seized by the U.S. in September 2008, added to debate over salaries for executives at companies dependent on government bailouts. Compensation must be sufficiently high to “attract and retain” top talent, their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said in a statement.

    In addition to the CEO pay, 10 additional executives at the two companies are eligible collectively for $30.1 million in compensation for this year. Overall, pay for top executives of the mortgage-finance companies is down 40 percent from before they were seized, the regulator said.

    Brian Faith, a Fannie Mae spokesman, and Michael Cosgrove, a Freddie Mac spokesman, declined to comment on the executive compensation and didn’t immediately return messages on the later Treasury announcement.

    The Obama administration is still developing its long-term plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In today’s statement, the department said it expected to release a preliminary report on the companies as part of the 2011 budget, due in February.

    ‘Prudent’ Policy

    Recent announcements from the companies and the Federal Housing Administration “demonstrate a commitment to prudent housing finance policy that enables a transition to an environment where the private market is able to provide a larger source of mortgage finance,” the Treasury said.

    The Treasury and Federal Housing Finance Agency seized control of the mortgage-finance companies almost 16 months ago amid fears the two were at risk of failing. The government- sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, own or guarantee about $5.5 trillion of the $11.7 trillion in U.S. residential mortgage debt.

    Officials set up the Treasury lifelines, which were expanded in May, to keep the companies solvent. If the two firms exhaust that backstop, regulators will be required to place them into receivership.

    Treasury officials weren’t likely to take the chance of allowing the companies to fall into receivership, which is a bankruptcy-like process that would increase the companies’ debt costs and disrupt the mortgage markets, Paul Miller, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets in Arlington, Virginia, said in an interview last week.

    GSE Losses

    Washington-based Fannie Mae has lost $120.5 billion over the past nine quarters and McLean, Virginia-based Freddie Mac has recorded $67.9 billion in cumulative losses over the past nine quarters amid a three-year housing slump.

    The companies are an integral part of President Barack Obama’s housing-relief plan and have been pushed by the government to help more homeowners renegotiate their mortgages to stay out of foreclosure.

    As part of today’s announcements, made ahead of a Dec. 31 expiration of some of the Treasury’s authority, the department said it would delay setting certain fees connected with the assistance program until the end of next year. The Treasury also made technical changes that affect the definition of mortgage assets and other accounting issues.

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • 18Dec

     

    Credit card’s newest trick: 79.9 percent interest
    First Premier card carries heavy interest rate

    It’s no mistake. This credit card’s interest rate is 79.9 percent.

    The bloated APR is how First Premier Bank, a subprime credit card issuer, is skirting new regulations intended to curb abusive practices in the industry. It’s a strategy other subprime card issuers could start adopting to get around the new rules.

    Typically, the First Premier card comes with a minimum of $256 in fees in the first year for a credit line of $250. Starting in February, however, a new law will cap such fees at 25 percent of a card’s credit line.

    In a recent mailing for a preapproved card, First Premier lowers fees to just that limit — $75 in the first year for a credit line of $300. But the new law doesn’t set a cap on interest rates. Hence the 79.9 APR, up from the previous 9.9 percent.

    “It’s the highest on the market. It’s the highest we’ve ever seen,” said Anuj Shahani, an analyst with Synovate, a research firm that tracks credit card mailings.

    The terms are eyebrow raising, but First Premier targets people with bad credit who likely can’t get approved for cards elsewhere. It’s a group that tends to lean heavily on credit too, meaning they’ll likely incur steep financing charges.

    So for a $300 balance, a cardholder would pay $20 a month in interest.

    First Premier said the 79.9 APR offer is a test and that it’s too early to tell whether it will be continued, according to an e-mailed statement. To comply with the new law, the bank said it will no longer offer the card that has $256 in first-year fees as of Feb. 21, 2010. However, customers will still be able to use their existing cards.

    According to First Premier’s Web site, the credit cards are issued by its sister organization Premier Bankcard. The company, based in Sioux Falls, S.D., says Premier Bankcard is the 10th largest issuer of MasterCard and Visa cards in the country, with more than 3.5 million customers.

    In a mailing sent to prospective customers in October with the revamped terms, First Premier writes “…you might have less-than-perfect credit and we’re OK with that.” The letter notes that an online application or phone call is still required, but guarantees a 60-second status confirmation.

    The letter also states there are no hidden fees that aren’t disclosed in the attached form. That’s where the 79.9 percent interest rate and $75 annual fee are listed. There’s also $29 penalty if you pay late or go over your credit limit. The credit limit is $300.

    The bank did not say how many people were offered the 79.9 APR card, but noted that it needed to “price our product based on the risk associated with this market.”

    Even if First Premier doesn’t stick with the 79.9 APR, it will likely hike rates considerably from the current 9.9 percent to offset the lower fees, said Shahani of Synovate.

    The revamped terms may not be the only changes; First Premier also appears to be moving away from the riskiest borrowers.

    The bank typically mails offers to subprime households, meaning those with credit scores below 700. In the third quarter, however, 84 percent of its offers were sent to subprime households, down from 91 percent the same period last year, according to Synovate.

    First Premier could be cleaning up its credit card portfolio since the new regulations will limit its ability to raise interest rates. That could mean First Premier won’t issue cards as liberally to those with bad credit.

    As harsh as First Premier’s terms seem, that could be a blow to those who rely on the card, said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub.com.

    “Even when the cost of credit is astronomical, for people in true emergencies, it’s much better than not having access to credit,” said Papadimitriou.

    Until Feb. 21, First Premier is still offering its even-higher-fee card online. So the price for credit the bank charges is at least $256 in first-year fees.

    Tags:

  • 28Nov
     
     
     

    The London Stock Exchange halted its trading for more than three hours on Thursday owing to technical snag.

     

    The trading halt, which affected numerous client connections to UK securities, lasted for more than three hours from 10.33 hours to 14.00 hours, when continuous trading resumed, the London Stock Exchange (LSE) said in a statement.

    The London Stock Exchange expressed regret over the inconvenience caused to its clients as a result of the said disruption.

    Commenting on the disruption LSE CEO Xavier Rolet said: “we regret the inconvenience that today’s disruption to trading has caused for our clients.  Having resolved the immediate issue, we are working hard to ensure this doesn’t happen again ahead of switching to MillenniumIT’s trading platform next year.”

    LSE further said that to ensure an orderly market, the Exchange took the decision to place the London market into an auction at 10:33, which had the effect of halting trading but allowed clients to continue to interact with orders on the system.

    “Having identified the source of the problem and gained confidence in the remedial steps needed to restore market connectivity, the Exchange initiated an auction call at 13:30, with continuous trading resuming across the market from 14:00,” LSE added.

    Tags: ,

  • 19Nov

    Stockshakers can expect a down opening Thursday for the US Equities markets.

    The US Dollar trade is showing signs of strength  here and the Euro trade that mirrored the inverse moves of the US Equities market may be decoupling.

    There is also an interesting leading indicator trend that Stockshakers have been successfully utilizing lately, the S&P500 compaired to the GOLD trade. Gold has been leading the move. Gold will dip and then very soon the S&P 500 will dip. Our biggest challenge still remains the lack of liquidty. Banks are not loaning cash and the jobs are not being generated quick enough.

    This will continue to be the challenge for global economies.

    Watch for the attempted first hour reversal and stay on the right side of the Trade trend.
    If we accelerate to the downside here keep in mind this options expiration week. Short covering is possible.

    Tags: , , , ,

« Previous Entries   



Recent Posts

 



Recent Comments

  • Stockshakers how do you do your scans? Love all of these opt...

stocks, banks, wall street, news, cash, stock tips, deals, equity, financial settlement, free stock info, free stock pick, global economy, loan, loans, market facts, market projections, money, daytrading, settlement, short term investments, stock tip, structured settlements, trading, trend, watch lists