• 21Feb

    What you need to know about credit card reform
     The new credit card regulations are finally here. Starting Monday, Feb. 22, 2010, banks will need to abide a spate of new rules on terms and disclosures. The idea behind the landmark law was to prevent banks from using unfair practices that dig borrowers deeper into debt.
    The new credit card law is finally here. Starting Monday, banks will need to abide by new regulations on terms and disclosures. The idea behind the landmark law was to prevent banks from using practices that often dug borrowers deeper into debt.
    A look at how the credit card law affects key aspects of your account.

    INTEREST RATES

    THEN: Banks could raise the interest rate on an account at any time, including the rate on an existing balances, even if you weren’t late on payments.

    NOW: The rate cannot be raised in the first year after an account is opened unless an introductory rate has come to an end. After that, cardholders must be notified 45 days in advance of any rate change.

    For existing balances, rates can’t be raised unless the account is at least 60 days past due. If payments are made on time for six consecutive months, the original rate must be restored.

    There’s still no cap on rates.

    DISCLOSURES

    THEN: The fine print on cardholder agreements was often difficult to understand. Rates, fees and penalties for other services such as cash advances, for example, could be hard to find. The impact of the interest rate on paying down a balance was hard to compute.

    NOW: Cardholders will see how many months it will take to pay off a balance if only minimum payments are made. Statements will also indicate how much needs to be paid each month to pay off a balance within three years.

    SERVICE FEES

    THEN: Banks could charge as much as they wanted. They could assess annual fees, activation fees and other fees. This was mostly a problem for subprime cards marketed to those with poor credit scores. One popular card, for example, the Premier Bankcard, charged $256 in first-year fees for a $250 credit line.

    NOW: Service fees, such as activation and annual fees, will be capped at 25 percent of the credit limit during the first year of use. After that, there is no cap.

    GRACE PERIODS

    THEN: Some card companies sent out statements not long before payments were due, and sometimes shifted payment due dates from month to month, meaning that payments would not always have enough time to arrive and get processed before being deemed late. As a result, some cardholders ended up getting charged interest or late fees even when they thought they were sending in payments on time.

    NOW: The law requires that due dates remain consistent. Statements must be sent out 21 days before the payment due date, and finance charges and fees cannot be applied before that period is up. In practice, about half of card issuers have extended grace periods to as long as 25 days.

    OVER-THE-LIMIT FEES

    THEN: Banks set credit limits, then routinely allowed charges to exceed those limits. When that happened, though, the customer was charged an over-the-limit fee as high as $39. These fees were often triggered by interest charges or late-payment fees that pushed a balance over the credit limit. What’s more, multiple over-the-limit fees could get charged in a single billing cycle if the balance was paid down and another charge pushed the balance back over the limit.

    NOW: The cardholder must specifically agree to permit transactions that exceed the credit limit. Only then can over-the-limit fees be charged. But the fees can’t be triggered by other fees or interest charges. Only one over-the-limit fee may be imposed during a billing cycle. No over-the-limit fees may be charged unless the cardholder has specifically agreed to permit transactions exceeding their authorized credit limit. These fees can no longer be triggered by other fees or interest charges imposed by the card issuer, and only one such fee may be imposed during a billing cycle.

    In practice, several of the largest card companies have dropped these fees. Some banks are using pop-up boxes on their Web sites or other methods to obtain consumer authorization.

    UNIVERSAL DEFAULT

    THEN: If you made a late payment on one credit card or loan, or even late payments for obligations like utility bills, that could trigger interest rate hikes on other credit card accounts.

    NOW: Card companies cannot raise interest rates on existing credit card balances. Interest rates can’t rise during the first year an account is open, unless the original agreement spelled out a promotional rate for a limited time.

    Consumers with older accounts must be informed of any interest rate increase on new charges at least 45 days in advance. They must also be given a chance to opt out of the hike by canceling the account and paying down the balance at the old interest rate. If an interest rate is increased, the card company must review the account once every six months to assess whether the rate should be dropped.

    STUDENTS

    THEN: Students arriving on college campuses often confronted a gantlet of credit card marketers handing out T-shirts, pizza and other gifts in exchange for filling out card applications. Credit cards were frequently handed out without checking the applicant’s income sources. In 2008, 84 percent of undergraduates had at least one credit card. Average balances topped $3,100.

    NOW: Credit cards may no longer be issued to anyone under age 21, unless the applicant has a co-signer, or can show independent means to repay the debt. Colleges must disclose any marketing deals they make with credit card companies. Banks are not allowed to hand out gifts on or near campuses or at college-related events.

    Tags: , ,

  • 18Dec

     

    Credit card’s newest trick: 79.9 percent interest
    First Premier card carries heavy interest rate

    It’s no mistake. This credit card’s interest rate is 79.9 percent.

    The bloated APR is how First Premier Bank, a subprime credit card issuer, is skirting new regulations intended to curb abusive practices in the industry. It’s a strategy other subprime card issuers could start adopting to get around the new rules.

    Typically, the First Premier card comes with a minimum of $256 in fees in the first year for a credit line of $250. Starting in February, however, a new law will cap such fees at 25 percent of a card’s credit line.

    In a recent mailing for a preapproved card, First Premier lowers fees to just that limit — $75 in the first year for a credit line of $300. But the new law doesn’t set a cap on interest rates. Hence the 79.9 APR, up from the previous 9.9 percent.

    “It’s the highest on the market. It’s the highest we’ve ever seen,” said Anuj Shahani, an analyst with Synovate, a research firm that tracks credit card mailings.

    The terms are eyebrow raising, but First Premier targets people with bad credit who likely can’t get approved for cards elsewhere. It’s a group that tends to lean heavily on credit too, meaning they’ll likely incur steep financing charges.

    So for a $300 balance, a cardholder would pay $20 a month in interest.

    First Premier said the 79.9 APR offer is a test and that it’s too early to tell whether it will be continued, according to an e-mailed statement. To comply with the new law, the bank said it will no longer offer the card that has $256 in first-year fees as of Feb. 21, 2010. However, customers will still be able to use their existing cards.

    According to First Premier’s Web site, the credit cards are issued by its sister organization Premier Bankcard. The company, based in Sioux Falls, S.D., says Premier Bankcard is the 10th largest issuer of MasterCard and Visa cards in the country, with more than 3.5 million customers.

    In a mailing sent to prospective customers in October with the revamped terms, First Premier writes “…you might have less-than-perfect credit and we’re OK with that.” The letter notes that an online application or phone call is still required, but guarantees a 60-second status confirmation.

    The letter also states there are no hidden fees that aren’t disclosed in the attached form. That’s where the 79.9 percent interest rate and $75 annual fee are listed. There’s also $29 penalty if you pay late or go over your credit limit. The credit limit is $300.

    The bank did not say how many people were offered the 79.9 APR card, but noted that it needed to “price our product based on the risk associated with this market.”

    Even if First Premier doesn’t stick with the 79.9 APR, it will likely hike rates considerably from the current 9.9 percent to offset the lower fees, said Shahani of Synovate.

    The revamped terms may not be the only changes; First Premier also appears to be moving away from the riskiest borrowers.

    The bank typically mails offers to subprime households, meaning those with credit scores below 700. In the third quarter, however, 84 percent of its offers were sent to subprime households, down from 91 percent the same period last year, according to Synovate.

    First Premier could be cleaning up its credit card portfolio since the new regulations will limit its ability to raise interest rates. That could mean First Premier won’t issue cards as liberally to those with bad credit.

    As harsh as First Premier’s terms seem, that could be a blow to those who rely on the card, said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub.com.

    “Even when the cost of credit is astronomical, for people in true emergencies, it’s much better than not having access to credit,” said Papadimitriou.

    Until Feb. 21, First Premier is still offering its even-higher-fee card online. So the price for credit the bank charges is at least $256 in first-year fees.

    Tags:

  • 07Nov

    Gold futures top $1,100/oz for first time
    Gold falls on investor disappointment, eyes $1,100
     
    Gold futures in New York rose to a record above $1,100 per ounce on Friday as the dollar eased in the wake of disappointing U.S. employment data.

    At 9:48 a.m. EST (1448 GMT) December gold GCZ9 was up $10.20 at $1,099.50 an ounce at the COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, having topped at $1,101.90 in morning trade.

    Spot gold XAU= reached a record at $1,100.90 per ounce.

    Tags: , , ,

  • 05Sep

    Iowa & Illinois banks bring 2009 failure total to 87

    Sioux City, Iowa based Vantus Bank and Oak Forest, Ill.-based InBank were closed by regulators Friday, bringing the number of U.S. bank failures this year to 87. Vantus Bank had roughly $368 million in deposits as of Aug. 28, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said, while InBank had $199 million in deposits as of Aug. 3. The combined bank failures will cost the federal deposit insurance fund $234 million, the FDIC said.

    Tags:

  • 03Aug

     

    Rally still in progress.
    Nasdaq is up an impressive 25% YTD.
    The U.S. stock market has been resilient and rebounded from early March low for the S&P 500 of 667.

    GDP number showed a 1% decline versus the 1.5% decline analysts expected.

     

    Current Headlines

    * The U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that unless the Senate approves $2 billion in additional funding, the Obama administration could be forced to halt as early as Tuesday the “cash for clunkers” program that has become one of the most visible and fast-acting of the government’s economic-stimulus programs.

    * A detective at the center of the Deutsche Bank AG <DBKGn.DE> spying affair says the international banking giant’s effort to monitor its critics was more extensive than previously disclosed in that it involved a plan to target as many as 20 people, including a number of investors.

    * While U.S. housing may be nearing a bottom, commercial real estate likely has much further to fall. And that could snuff out a significant rally in real-estate-investment-trust stocks.

    * General Motors Co Chairman Edward Whitacre Jr. and other new board members meet Monday for the first time, as the car maker seeks a path to profitability.

    * The chief investment officer of the widely watched funds known as U.S. Oil Fund and U.S. Natural Gas Fund is one of several people expected to testify Wednesday at a Commodity Futures Trading Commission hearing as part of the agency’s efforts to curb speculation. The CFTC released a witness list Friday.

    * The UK’s Serious Fraud Office is investigating sales of structured products such as credit-default swaps and collateralized debt obligations, amid concern some bankers may have knowingly sold complex assets based on flawed valuations before the global financial crisis struck two years ago.

    * New Jersey’s gambling commission reopened for review MGM Mirage’s <MGM.N> license to run a casino in Atlantic City, citing a continuing investigation into its relationship with Pansy Ho, its business partner in the Chinese enclave of Macau.

    * British Airways PLC <BAY.L>, citing declining passenger numbers and cargo volumes, reported its first pretax loss for the fiscal first quarter since its shares were listed 22 years ago.

    * GOME Electrical Appliances <0493.HK> founder Huang Guangyu, who is under arrest in mainland China, will retain a one-third stake in the big Chinese electronics retailer, thwarting private equity firm Bain Capital LLC’s attempt to take a bigger stake in the firm.

    * Ford Motor Co <F.N> saw an increase in its July sales, the first year-over-year jump for the auto maker in almost two years, according to the company’s sales analyst.

    * The U.S. administration’s top economic officials suggested they would consider pushing to extend unemployment benefits that expire later this year, underscoring White House concerns that job creation is likely to lag behind a broader recovery.

    * JPMorgan Chase & Co <JPM.N> appointed Frank Gong, its chief China economist and head of China research, to the newly created role of vice chairman of China investment banking.

    * Businesses are tracking social-media outlets such as Facebook and Twitter to gauge consumer sentiment and avert potential public-relations problems.

    * Suzlon Energy <SUZL.BO> reported a net loss of 4.53 billion rupees ($94.7 million) in the April-June quarter, swinging from a net profit of 93 million rupees in the same period last year amid lower sales and orders postponed by customers.

    * Moody’s Investors Service downgraded two American International Group Inc <AIG.N> lending units to the brink of “junk” territory, saying that without support from the insurance giant, both would already be speculative-grade.

    * The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has launched an inquiry into why Apple Inc <AAPL.O> rejected Google Inc’s <GOOG.O> Internet-telephony software for the popular iPhone, another sign of the Obama administration’s stepped-up scrutiny of competitive practices in the technology industry.

    Stockshakers still long MVIS BMY

    Tags: , , ,

  • 01Aug

     

     

    Failed Bank List


    The FDIC is often appointed as receiver for failed banks. This page contains useful information for the customers and vendors of these banks. This includes information on the acquiring bank (if applicable), how your accounts and loans are affected, and how vendors can file claims against the receivership. Failed Financial Institution Contact Search displays point of contact information related to failed banks.

    This list includes banks which have failed since October 1, 2000.

    Click arrows next to headers to sort in Ascending or Descending order.

    Bank Name

    City

    State

    CERT #

    Closing Date

    Updated Date

    Mutual Bank Harvey IL 18659 July 31, 2009 July 31, 2009
    First BankAmericano Elizabeth NJ 34270 July 31, 2009 July 31, 2009
    Peoples Community Bank West Chester OH 32288 July 31, 2009 July 31, 2009
    Integrity Bank Jupiter FL 57604 July 31, 2009 July 31, 2009
    First State Bank of Altus Altus OK 9873 July 31, 2009 July 31, 2009
    Security Bank of Jones County Gray GA 8486 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Security Bank of Houston County Perry GA 27048 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Security Bank of Bibb County Macon GA 27367 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Security Bank of North Metro Woodstock GA 57105 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Security Bank of North Fulton Alpharetta GA 57430 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Security Bank of Gwinnett County Suwanee GA 57346 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Waterford Village Bank Williamsville NY 58065 July 24, 2009 July 30, 2009
    Temecula Valley Bank Temecula CA 34341 July 17, 2009 July 23, 2009
    Vineyard Bank Rancho Cucamonga CA 23556 July 17, 2009 July 23, 2009
    BankFirst Sioux Falls SD 34103 July 17, 2009 July 23, 2009
    First Piedmont Bank Winder GA 34594 July 17, 2009 July 23, 2009
    Bank of Wyoming Thermopolis WY 22754 July 10, 2009 July 15, 2009
    Founders Bank Worth IL 18390 July 2, 2009 July 7, 2009
    Millennium State Bank of Texas Dallas TX 57667 July 2, 2009 July 7, 2009
    First National Bank of Danville Danville IL 3644 July 2, 2009 July 7, 2009

    Unless if you are a bank…

    Tags: , , , , , ,

  • 01Jun

    TOP 5 LARGEST U.S. BANKRUPTCIES

    Lehman Brothers Holdings

    Rank: 1
    Date of bankruptcy filing: 09/15/08
    Assets: $691 billion

    One of the biggest calamities of the current recession is the fall of the once highly regarded (and onetime fourth-largest) Wall Street investment firm, which was forced to file for bankruptcy protection last September, the largest corporate filing in the history of U.S. bankruptcy court. As a result, the company’s North American investment banking and trading businesses and New York City headquarters were sold to British bank Barclays. Some of Lehman’s U.S. businesses, including wealth management firm Neuberger-Berman, continue to operate as stand-alone entities under new ownership. And because of the company’s global reach, its bankruptcy proceedings are complex, ongoing, and have resulted in the closing of 80 of the bank’s smaller subsidiaries.

     
    Washington Mutual

    Rank: 2
    Date of bankruptcy filing: 09/26/08
    Assets: $327.9 billion

    Amid fears of insolvency, customers of Washington Mutual withdrew more than $16 billion of deposits over a 10-day period last fall, causing a government regulator to seize the holding company’s banking assets and sell them to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion. The following day WaMu filed for bankruptcy protection. What was once the nation’s largest savings and loan and sixth-largest bank is now a shadow of its former self. The holding company currently is suing the FDIC for improper seizure and is seeking $13 billion in damages.

     
    WorldCom

    Rank: 3
    Date of bankruptcy filing: 07/21/02
    Assets: $103.9 billion

    Once the second-largest long-distance telecom in the U.S. after AT&T, WorldCom filed for bankruptcy protection following the discovery of an $11 billion accounting scandal. In 2003 the company re-dubbed itself MCI, (the name of one of its previous acquisitions), and then emerged from bankruptcy a year later. In 2005 MCI was acquired by Verizon Communications for $7.6 billion and former CEO Bernie Ebbers was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being convicted of securities fraud, conspiracy, and filing false documents. He is serving his term at Oakdale federal prison in Louisiana.

     
    General Motors

    Rank: 4
    Date of bankruptcy filing: 6/1/09
    Assets: $91 billion

    The automotive giant, which for many years was the largest U.S. company and reigning king of the Fortune 500, now ranks as the largest industrial company (and fourth-largest overall) to seek bankruptcy protection in the history of American business. The likely outcome of the reorganization will be the emergence of a new version of the company that holds onto Chevy, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. The remaining, poor-performing brands Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer, Saab and Opel might be held by separate, spun-off companies, sold to foreign manufacturers, or simply closed down. As part of the bailout agreement, the U.S. government will own nearly 72.5% of the new company, with the United Auto Workers owning 17.5%.

     

    Enron

    Rank: 5
    Date of bankruptcy filing: 12/02/01
    Assets: $65.5 billion

    The collapse of a vast creative-accounting scandal destroyed the nation’s largest energy, electricity and natural gas company in 2001. After a long and arduous case that was the most-watched bankruptcy proceeding in history, Enron emerged from bankruptcy protection three years later in 2004. Several of its top executives were later convicted of many counts of securities and accounting fraud. In addition to bringing down accounting firm Arthur Andersen, the Enron scandal is considered a landmark case because it inspired the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which set new standards and practices for public companies. In 2007, Enron changed its name to Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. with the intention of liquidating the company’s remaining assets.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • 20May

    How new credit card rules affect you
    Meltdown 101: How will the changes in credit card regulations affect ordinary cardholders?
    The overhaul of the credit card industry is being hailed as a triumph for long-abused consumers. But before you start banking on falling interest rates or vanishing fees, you might want to read the fine print.

    Credit card legislation that Congress sent President Barack Obama on Wednesday bans certain practices by card issuers, but there’s still no limit on the charges that can come with your monthly statement. And it’s likely credit card companies will start searching for additional ways to earn profits.

    That means cardholders across the board — even those who always pay on time — will probably see higher charges on a variety of services.

    Obama is expected to sign the bill in the coming days. Credit card lenders will then have nine months to be in compliance.

    Here are some questions and answers about protections the bill spells out — and others that it doesn’t.

    Q: What practices are still allowed that I should be aware of?

    A: The bill doesn’t cap interest rates, as some lawmakers had hoped it would. While lenders generally can no longer raise rates on existing balances — at least until the cardholder is very late with payments — they can still raise them going forward.

    That’s true even for people who already saw their rates climb in recent months. The bill doesn’t shield from further hikes in coming months — or ever.

    “With all these limitations, (card issuers) still have a lot of freedom to charge what they want,” said Ruth Susswein, a spokeswoman for Consumer Action, an advocacy group in Washington, D.C.

    Q: What if I always paid my bills on time?

    A: There will likely be higher fees and interest rates across the board to make up for lost profit.

    Card issuers in the past few months have already started raising fees for services such as balance transfers and cash advances. It’s a trend that’s likely to continue in the near future.

    Card issuers also might start charging higher rates at the outset, when a customer gets a new card.

    Getting approved for a new credit card will probably be harder, too — even for those with a solid credit history. And if approved, the card will probably come with a lower credit limit than in the past.

    With credit so much harder to come by, people could begin turning to outlets such as payday lenders and pawn shops, said Greg McBride, senior analyst with Bankrate.com.

    “In the absence of credit cards, people in need of a short-term loan will resort to other means,” he said.

    Q: What can I expect to happen in the next nine months?

    A: Be on the lookout for any letters from your credit card company. They could be notifications about rate or fee hikes as card issuers prepare to get in compliance with the new bill.

    “The next nine months are going to be filled with issuers implementing changes while they still can,” McBride said.

    Q: So what specific practices DOES the bill ban?

    A: Card issuers will no longer be able to raise interest rates on existing balances. The exception is if a payment is 60 days late; at that point, there’s no cap on how much they can hike rates. If the cardholder pays the minimum balance on time, though, the lender would be required to restore the lower rate after six months.

    Among other restrictions:

    – Consumers will have to get 45 days’ notice and an explanation before their interest rate could be increased.

    – If a company uses “risk-based pricing” to raise rates on riskier borrowers, they have to use that same methodology to lower rates when appropriate.

    – The Federal Reserve in coming months will determine what constitutes “reasonable and proportional” penalty fees. This might include a cap on the dollar amount card issuers could charge for penalties such as late fees.

    – Card issuers can charge a fee for over-the-phone payments only if you speak with a live operator. Charges will no longer be allowed for automated phone or online payments.

    – You will have to opt in for the ability to go over your credit limit, which can trigger a fee as high as $40. Issuers will also be limited to charging three over-the-limit charges for a single infraction. So if your balance goes over the limit and you fail to make any payments, you could only be charged over-the-limit fees for three payment periods; right now, issuers can continue charging that fee indefinitely on unpaid balances.

    – Those 21 and under will need to show they have an independent source of income to get a credit card. Otherwise, they will need a co-signer.

    Q: How will my communications with my card issuer change?

    A: For starters, you might be getting your bills sooner; companies need to send statements at least 21 days before payments are due under the new bill.

    Card holders will also be able to clearly see how much it’s costing them to borrow. For instance, monthly bills will come with little boxes stating how much they’ve paid in interest and in fees year-to-date.

    Statements will also spell out how long it will take to pay off a balance if only a minimum payment is made. And companies will need to include a toll-free number where the cardholder can get information about credit counseling and debt management.

    Q: How does the new legislation differ from other regulations that were recently imposed?

    A: Some of the new rules were already spelled out in regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve this winter; those regulations go into effect in July 2010.

    The new bill is more specific and offers greater protection by making the changes law. In general, laws are much more difficult to alter or eliminate than regulations as they require an act of Congress.

    Tags: , , ,

  • 20May

    STOCKSHAKERS BREAKING NEWS: Senate passes credit card bill

    The Senate has voted to prohibit credit card companies from arbitrarily raising a person’s interest rate and charging many of the exorbitant fees that have become customary and crippling to cash-strapped consumers.

    Tags: , ,

  • 14May

    Private equity groups braced for investor exodus
    The private equity industry is poised for an unprecedented rush to the door by investors as more than a 10th of them plan to sell fund interests in the next two years, according to research published today.

    When investors commit money to a private equity fund, it is locked in for at least 10 years and drawn down as needed by the fund manager to finance investments.

    During the credit bubble, when private equity deals ballooned, investors increased their commitments to the industry dramatically, expecting them to be financed by the flow of cash back from earlier deals.

    Now that cash has dried up, they are being forced to turn to the opaque and unstructured secondary market to raise capital and escape from the unfunded commitments they cannot afford to meet.

    Today’s research from Preqin, which surveyed 568 institutional investors, also found that almost half of them were interested in buying secondhand private equity holdings from other investors in earlier funds.

    As investors focus on buying secondhand assets, it is likely to mean that it will take longer before private equity groups can raise new funds from their investors.

    “Why go into a primary fund when you can get secondaries more cheaply?” asked Andrew Sealey, managing partner of Campbell Lutyens, a private equity adviser.

    Preqin said 11 per cent of institutions (excluding funds of funds, which are already regular users of the secondary market) planned to sell fund interests.

    It forecast that $75bn- $100bn of private equity assets could change hands, half in the next year.

    The research found that 48 per cent of active private equity investors, including pension funds, endowments, insurers and sovereign wealth funds, had indicated an interest in buying on the secondary market in the next two years.

    “If you have an investment that you like in a private equity fund and someone says you can have some more for half the price, then that is a sensible thing to do,” said Brenlen Jinkens, managing director of Cogent Partners, the secondary market adviser.

    However, specialist secondary investors said there had been very little activity so far this year, even after private equity groups published their year-end valuations, which some had expected to trigger a rush of activity.

    Peter Wilson, managing director of HarbourVest’s secondary arm, said: “Buyers are anticipating a drop in forward earnings.

    “Sellers are optimistic because of the rally in stock markets. The two forces are pulling in opposite directions.”

    Instead of being the exclusive preserve of specialist secondary funds, he said more secondhand assets were being bought by traditional investors.

    “They look at the big discounts and see a way to reduce their initial cost of entry into a fund,” he said.

    Michael Granoff, chief executive of Pomona Capital, a $6bn private equity fund of funds, said: “A big problem buyers have today is that it is very hard to figure out what these assets are worth, not just today, but what they will be worth tomorrow.”

    He forecast that activity was likely to pick up when private equity deal flow recovered, triggering calls for investors to meet undrawn capital commitments.

    “Probably capital calls will come before distributions for most private equity investors - so that could increase the pressure to sell,” said Mr Granoff. “I think the market will clear gradually.”

    Tags: , , ,

« Previous Entries   



Recent Posts

 



Recent Comments

  • Stockshakers how do you do your scans? Love all of these opt...

stocks, banks, wall street, news, cash, stock tips, deals, equity, financial settlement, free stock info, free stock pick, global economy, loan, loans, market facts, market projections, money, daytrading, settlement, short term investments, stock tip, structured settlements, trading, trend, watch lists